Notice: Constant DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT already defined in /home/csuj7ahstc0m/public_html/wp-config.php on line 99
Transfer Pricing Penalties in the US | Mitigation, Relief, and Compliance
TransPrice is a member firm of Quantera Global worldwide

Understanding Transfer Pricing Penalties in the US

One significant aspect of transfer pricing regulations is the imposition of penalties for non-compliance. In the US, transfer pricing penalties are not a part of Section 482 or the Treasury Regulations enforcing it. Instead, these penalties are part of Section 6662 concerning penalties imposed for the underpayment of income tax resulting from inaccuracy-related misstatements of taxable income.

The penalties are imposed when allocations under Section 482 result in substantial or gross increases in taxable income or where there are substantial or gross valuation misstatements with respect to the transfer prices themselves. However, these penalties can be avoided if the taxpayer can demonstrate that it reasonably used a method of determining transfer prices specified in Section 482 or used another method that more reliably determined its transfer prices. The taxpayer must also provide documentation that is in existence at the time of filing the tax return and provide such documentation to the IRS within 30 days of a request.

Transfer pricing documentation is therefore required to prevent the imposition of penalties in the case of a Section 482 allocation. These penalties can be considerable. In the case of an underpayment of income tax resulting from a substantial transfer pricing misstatement, the penalty is equal to 20% of the amount of the underpayment.

The penalty provision exists if an income tax return understates taxable income and reports a transfer price for a transaction that is itself 200% or more (or 50% or less) than the transfer price determined in accordance with Section 482, and such reported transfer price is the cause of the understatement of taxable income (the transactional penalty). Additionally, the penalty is increased to 40% of any underpayment of tax resulting from a gross transfer pricing misstatement.

There is a reasonable cause and good faith exception to these penalties that may apply to some portion of an underpayment. Still, unless a taxpayer meets the requirements of Section 6662 with respect to a net adjustment penalty, the taxpayer cannot meet the requirements of the reasonable cause exception. Conversely, if the requirements of Section 6662 are met with respect to a portion of an underpayment that would give rise to a transactional penalty, the taxpayer will be considered to have acted with reasonable cause and in good faith, and the penalty will not apply.

Penalties for negligence and valuation misstatement cannot be avoided by disclosure. Penalties could be avoided if the taxpayer can demonstrate good faith with respect to the transaction. It is essential to understand that failure to comply with the transfer pricing documentation requirements can result in substantial penalties.

The penalty rules under section 6038 generally apply to the requirement for CbC (country-by-country) reporting, including reasonable cause relief for failure to file. If the CbC report is not filed on time, a penalty of USD 10,000 will be applicable for each annual accounting period with respect to which such failure exists.

In conclusion, transfer pricing penalties can have severe consequences for companies that do not comply with transfer pricing regulations. It is crucial to maintain accurate transfer pricing documentation and to comply with reporting requirements to avoid these penalties. Companies must understand the rules and regulations surrounding transfer pricing and work closely with their tax advisors to ensure compliance. Failure to comply with these regulations can result in significant financial and reputational damage to the company.

Whatapp Us
Have query? Consult with our experts
Have query? Consult with our experts